ترجمه فارسی مقاله تأثیر مدل های بزرگ زبان در بومی سازی گسل

• کتاب صدها نکته فارسی (خودمونی) – نسخه PDF — زبان ساده و کاربردی
  مشاهده نمونه نسخه نکات ساده
• کتاب صدها نکته رسمی فارسی – نسخه PDF — نگارش استاندارد و علمی
  مشاهده نمونه نسخه نکات رسمی
• کتاب صدها پرسش و پاسخ تشریحی – نسخه PDF
  — هر سؤال همراه با پاسخ کامل برای درک عمیق مفاهیم
  مشاهده نمونه نسخه پرسش و پاسخ
• کتاب پرسش و پاسخ چهارگزینه‌ای – نسخه یادگیری سریع
  — پاسخ‌ها بلافاصله بعد از سؤال برای مرور سریع
  مشاهده نمونه نسخه کوییز سریع
• کتاب پرسش و پاسخ چهارگزینه‌ای – نسخه خودآزمایی
  — پاسخ‌ها در انتهای بخش‌ها برای سنجش واقعی یادگیری
  مشاهده نمونه نسخه آزمونی

🎯 این بسته یک دورهٔ آموزشی کامل و چندلایه است؛ شامل ویدیوهای آموزشی، کتاب‌ها، تمرین‌ها و خودآزمایی.

چکیده

Identifying the point of error is imperative in software debugging. Traditional fault localization (FL) techniques rely on executing the program and using the code coverage matrix in tandem with test case results to calculate a suspiciousness score for each function or line. Recently, learning-based FL techniques have harnessed machine learning models to extract meaningful features from the code coverage matrix and improve FL performance. These techniques, however, require compilable source code, existing test cases, and specialized tools for generating the code coverage matrix for each programming language of interest. In this paper, we propose, for the first time, a simple but effective sequence generation approach for fine-tuning large language models of code (LLMCs) for FL tasks. LLMCs have recently received much attention for various software engineering problems. In line with these, we leverage the innate understanding of code that LLMCs have acquired through pre-training on large code corpora. Specifically, we fine-tune representative encoder, encoder-decoder, and decoder-based 13 LLMCs for FL tasks. Unlike previous approaches, LLMCs can analyze code sequences even with syntactic errors, since they do not rely on compiled input. Still, they have a limitation on the length of the input data. Therefore, for a fair comparison with existing FL techniques, we extract methods with errors from the project-level benchmark, Defects4J, and analyze them at the line level. Experimental results show that LLMCs fine-tuned with our approach successfully pinpoint error positions in 50.6\%, 64.2\%, and 72.3\% of 1,291 methods in Defects4J for Top-1/3/5 prediction, outperforming the best learning-based state-of-the-art technique by up to 1.35, 1.12, and 1.08 times, respectively. Our findings suggest promising research directions for FL and automated program repair tasks using LLMCs.

چکیده به فارسی (ترجمه ماشینی)