ترجمه فارسی مقاله تعمیم فراموش نشدنی در مدل های زبان

• کتاب صدها نکته فارسی (خودمونی) – نسخه PDF — زبان ساده و کاربردی
  مشاهده نمونه نسخه نکات ساده
• کتاب صدها نکته رسمی فارسی – نسخه PDF — نگارش استاندارد و علمی
  مشاهده نمونه نسخه نکات رسمی
• کتاب صدها پرسش و پاسخ تشریحی – نسخه PDF
  — هر سؤال همراه با پاسخ کامل برای درک عمیق مفاهیم
  مشاهده نمونه نسخه پرسش و پاسخ
• کتاب پرسش و پاسخ چهارگزینه‌ای – نسخه یادگیری سریع
  — پاسخ‌ها بلافاصله بعد از سؤال برای مرور سریع
  مشاهده نمونه نسخه کوییز سریع
• کتاب پرسش و پاسخ چهارگزینه‌ای – نسخه خودآزمایی
  — پاسخ‌ها در انتهای بخش‌ها برای سنجش واقعی یادگیری
  مشاهده نمونه نسخه آزمونی

🎯 این بسته یک دورهٔ آموزشی کامل و چندلایه است؛ شامل ویدیوهای آموزشی، کتاب‌ها، تمرین‌ها و خودآزمایی.

چکیده

When language models (LMs) are trained to forget (or "unlearn'') a skill, how precisely does their behavior change? We study the behavior of transformer LMs in which tasks have been forgotten via fine-tuning on randomized labels. Such LMs learn to generate near-random predictions for individual examples in the "training'' set used for forgetting. Across tasks, however, LMs exhibit extreme variability in whether LM predictions change on examples outside the training set. In some tasks (like entailment classification), forgetting generalizes robustly, and causes models to produce uninformative predictions on new task instances; in other tasks (like physical commonsense reasoning and scientific question answering) forgetting affects only the training examples, and models continue to perform the "forgotten'' task accurately even for examples very similar to those that appeared in the training set. Dataset difficulty is not predictive of whether a behavior can be forgotten; instead, generalization in forgetting is (weakly) predicted by the confidence of LMs' initial task predictions and the variability of LM representations of training data, with low confidence and low variability both associated with greater generalization. Perhaps most surprisingly, random-label forgetting appears to be somewhat insensitive to the contents of the training set: for example, models trained on science questions with random labels continue to answer other science questions accurately, but begin to produce random labels on entailment classification tasks. Finally, we show that even generalizable forgetting is shallow: linear probes trained on LMs' representations can still perform tasks reliably after forgetting. Our results highlight the difficulty and unpredictability of performing targeted skill removal from models via fine-tuning.

چکیده به فارسی (ترجمه ماشینی)